Show Summary Details

Page of

 PRINTED FROM the OXFORD RESEARCH ENCYCLOPEDIA, CLASSICS ( (c) Oxford University Press USA, 2016. All Rights Reserved. Personal use only; commercial use is strictly prohibited. Please see applicable Privacy Policy and Legal Notice (for details see Privacy Policy).

date: 24 May 2017

damnatio memoriae

After the deaths of persons deemed by the senate enemies of the state, measures to erase their memory might follow. Originally there was no set package, as the phrase implies (cf. Ulp.Dig. 24. 1. 32. 7) but a repertoire (Tac.Ann. 3. 17. 8–18. 1): images might be destroyed (Sejanus; Valeria Messal(l)ina), and their display penalized (L. Appuleius Saturninus, 98 bce), the name erased from inscriptions, and a man's praenomen banned in his family (Livy 6. 20. 14; 384 bce!). With emperors their acts were abolished. Claudius prevented the senate from condemning Gaius (1) (Cass. Dio 60. 4. 5); but decrees were passed against Domitian (Suet.Dom.23), Commodus (SHA Comm. 20), and Elagabalus (SHA Heliogab.17).


P. Vittinghoff, Der Staatsfeind in der römischen Kaiserzeit (1936).Find this resource:

R. Bauman, Impietas in Principem (1974), see index.Find this resource:

H. I. Flower, The Art of Forgetting (2006).Find this resource:

Do you have feedback?